Skip to main content

Breakthrough Teleconverter for Consumer Lenses: Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 DGX 1.4x

Few questions from safari participants make me cringe as much as the one about using a Teleconverter with their consumer or prosumer lenses. Both Nikon and Canon have worked hard on excellent Teleconverters for their high-end pro Telephoto lenses, but for some good reasons have orphaned their other lenses in that regard. Solutions were all ugly, involving a loss of Auto-Focus and often physical modifications to lenses. But now all that has changed with the introduction of the …

Before I sing some of the praises of the new Kenko DGX converters I want to state a couple massive caveats up front. First and foremost, consumer and prosumer lenses aren’t built with the ultra-sharp optics required to get tack sharp images with a Teleconverter. So there is going to be some loss of sharpness with any Teleconverter for those lenses. But in many cases the tradeoff may be worth it if it is the only cost effective way you can reach the focal length you need.

And second, even though the new Kenko TCs amazingly support AutoFocus (at least in the configurations I tested it) like any Teleconverter it will reduce the available light (by 1 stop for a 1.4x) so you’re not going to get blazingly fast AF by the time you take a relatively slow consumer lens and drop another stop of light. Any teleconverter, especially on a less expensive lens, is not a substitute for a larger, longer, and more expensive dedicated lens--but it's certainly a lot less expensive and can be a lot more convenient.

All that said, the Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4x DGX TC for Nikon and Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4x DGX TC for Canon are pretty impressive. The very first welcome surprise is that it mated perfectly with the Nikon and Sigma lenses I tried without any of the hacking and filing that is needed to get the Nikon Teleconverters to mount to them. It went on smoothly and appeared to lock nicely. Like other Kenko products I wouldn’t compare the build quality to a similar Nikon product. It is less than half the price and some of that cost savings is from a slightly less elegant and robust build. But it was solid and seems like it will hold up well.

DJC_0557
This image shows a park sign at f/8 with the Nikon 24-120 (VR version) and the new Kenko 1.4TC. The 24-120 is an “okay” lens to start with and with the Teleconverter you can certainly see that the letters on the sign are not razor sharp, but they are remarkably good considering that we just increased our effective focal length from 120 to 170 for only $200. Note that the image is at f/8 so that the planes in the background are not razor sharp partially because of focus, independent of the sharpness of the lens and converter.

Below is a landscape scene to give you a sense of the images which are possible with a standard consumer lens and the Teleconverter.

DJC_0581

The newest version of the Teleconverters, the Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4x DGX TC for Nikon and Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4x DGX TC for Canon also have one other nice feature. It correctly reports the effective f-Stop of the combination of the lens and teleconverter—the older versions wouldn’t take into account the light reduction from the Teleconverter.

Another caveat about this type of teleconverter solution is I’d really hesitate to push it past 1.4x. More than that and the light loss and optical issues are going to pile up. With the 1.4x version I was very pleased that (as you can see above) there is virtually no light falloff in the corners, even on the full frame Nikon D700.

Now that I’ve taken the TC out for a spin with a standard consumer lens I’ll be experimenting using on my bear safaris with some of my Pro lenses to see if it makes sense as a less expensive alternative to the Nikon AF-S Teleconverters. It correctly mounts on my Pro AF-S lenses and does a good job of Auto-focusing, but next will come a test of image quality.


Offline
Joined: 12/31/2002
older 80-200 f/2.8 (AF-D)

. . .  so this thing would effectively turn it into a 280mm lens @the long end & f4 wide open?  ( actually it would be more like a 270 as that lens tends to be a little soft racked out to 200 -- at least mine is.... )  Still -- it would be better than the effective 190'ish that I have now.  Is my math right?  ( I'd be using it on my D700 )

Offline
Joined: 03/12/2009
That's exactly right. I

That's exactly right. I haven't actually tested it on an older 80-200, but based on using it on several of my lenses and several client lenses it should work okay. As I mentioned it did lose connectivity on my 200-400 once in awhile, but of course on the 80-200 you really don't have another option for a TC that will auto-focus so this might be very helpful.

--David Cardinal Cardinal Photo

Offline
Joined: 12/31/2002
thanks

:)

Offline
Joined: 03/12/2009
Kenko TC

Very Interesting, esp for the price.

Offline
Joined: 03/12/2009
Kenko TC a mixed blessing...

After a couple weeks of heavy use I can report mixed results with the Kenko converter. The good news is that it did indeed Auto-Focus with a wide variety of lenses (including the Sigma 120-400). And image quality was quite good (given that it is after all a teleconverter). The not so good news is that it lost electrical connectivity when I used it with my 200-400 every once in a while and required re-seating. A bummer if it happens in the middle of an action sequence.

So for AF-S lenses it's not an ideal replacement for the Nikon version, but if you have other lenses not supported by the Nikon converter it is a great tool to have in your bag.

--David Cardinal Cardinal Photo

Login or register to post comments